Swiping Left on “Materialists”: When a Star-Studded Cast Can’t Save a Shallow Script

sara yahia
By
Sara Yahia
sara yahia
HR Leader | Author | Cultural Commentator | DEI & Kindness Advocate | Philanthropist
Sara Yahia is an award-winning HR expert and the author of four books, including Quietly Sparks. With more than a decade of cross-industry experience, she champions...
- HR Leader | Author | Cultural Commentator | DEI & Kindness Advocate | Philanthropist

I’m seeing a ton of matchmakers online promoting their services these days; it’s officially a trend, especially with all the buzz around Materialists. This much-hyped romantic drama is what everyone’s been talking about. How can I blame them? With Dakota Johnson, Pedro Pascal, and Chris Evans gracing the screen, I went in expecting fireworks and a cinematic feast. Instead… well, let’s say the sparks never really landed and I got a lukewarm appetizer.

The Plot: A Matchmaker’s Dilemma

Lucy (played by the alluring Dakota Johnson) is a successful matchmaker in New York, secretly craves stability and safety, while projecting confidence in her work by building relationships for others. But she gets caught in a love triangle that feels almost like a modern fairy tale gone wrong.

On one side, there’s Harry (portrayed by the charming Pedro Pascal). He is essentially a unicorn: a 10 out of 10 eligible bachelor, financially secure, handsome, emotionally intelligent… the whole package.

On the other hand, John (the irresistibly charismatic Chris Evans), her ex, is a late-30s part-time waiter living with roommates, paycheck to paycheck, as he chases his dream as a starving artist.

The film clearly wants to critique modern dating, the commodification of love, and the “what I want vs. what I am” dilemma. But the execution falls flat. Instead of exploring the real tension between desire and reality, it ends up feeling like thinly disguised propaganda: the “poor man versus rich man” trope with zero nuance.

We’re left with surreal, delusional expectations: people longing for perfection while being glaringly imperfect themselves, and the superficiality of modern romance is on full display, yet strangely hollow.

The Cast: Eye Candy, No Substance

While the cast is undeniably attractive… I mean, who doesn’t swoon a little seeing Pedro Pascal’s effortless charm or Chris Evans’ boy-next-door charisma? However, their performances are consistently undermined by the script. It’s like giving gourmet ingredients to a cook who only knows how to make instant noodles.

No matter how magnetic they are, the predictable storyline and lackluster dialogue leave them stranded. Scenes that should feel electric or heartfelt come off flat, and you can practically see them working overtime to inject life into lines that just… don’t.

It’s a shame, because with a richer script, this trio could have carried a genuinely moving exploration of love, ambition, and modern dating. Instead, we get style without substance.

Modern Dating in 2025: A Hollow Pursuit

The film tries to tackle a familiar stereotype about modern dating: that women are increasingly materialistic, torn between “settling” for rich, “perfect” men and chasing thrilling and draining dreamers. It suggests that prioritizing passion is reckless, that people have high expectations, and that women feel constant pressure from the ticking biological and social clocks, all while risking heartbreak and missing out on the quiet contentment of a grounded life.

Ironically, Lucy herself left John years ago for the same reason: he was chasing his artistic dreams while she wanted security, and she had her own ambitions too. Now, she’s faced with the choice again, but the movie twists it into a false narrative: she’s somehow “making a mistake” if she doesn’t go with Harry, the flawless financier.

The kicker? Pedro Pascal, funnily enough, has more in common with John than Harry. He was once a struggling actor on the verge of giving up when he landed his big break. Yet the script doesn’t let us see this nuance.

Instead of exploring these layers, the film reduces them to caricatures, reinforcing the very stereotypes it appears to be critiquing. The characters feel like plot devices rather than real humans. The stakes vanish before they matter.

The film’s attempt at intellectualizing romance doesn’t compensate for its emotional void. It serves as a reminder that a star-studded cast can’t mask a poorly written script.

If you’re looking for a romantic film that delves into the complexities of love, Materialists might not be the one. While it offers a critique of modern dating, it falls short of providing a compelling narrative. It proves once again: no amount of star power can rescue a hollow script. Perhaps it’s time to revisit classics that truly understand the intricacies of love and relationships.

You may also like reviews about: Aema, Night Always Comes, My Oxford Year, The Handmaid’s Tale, Workin’ Moms, … More Reviews HERE

Share This Article
sara yahia
HR Leader | Author | Cultural Commentator | DEI & Kindness Advocate | Philanthropist
Follow:
Sara Yahia is an award-winning HR expert and the author of four books, including Quietly Sparks. With more than a decade of cross-industry experience, she champions the power of quiet strength, introversion, and emotional intelligence in modern leadership. Beyond her HR work, Sara has recently taken on a new role as a culture commentator, where her articles are regularly reposted on The Cherrypicks platform, and her opinion have also been featured on Rotten Tomatoes. She believes leadership doesn’t need to be loud to create impact, but values like purpose, empathy, and authenticity build the strongest foundations. At the heart of her work is a simple truth: meaningful leadership begins from within and flourishes in environments where diversity, kindness, and respect are valued.
Leave a Comment